China pr - Super League
2026 ▼
Stats ▼
Latest results
Matches
Form Tables
Goals
Halftime
Timing
First Goal stats
Results Grid
Home & Away tables
Tables by Date
Wide table
Points Performance Index
Run-in Analysis
Projected Points
Total Goals
Goal Ranges
Average Goals
Scored vs Conceded
Goal Margins
Lead Durations
Current Streaks
Equalizers
Leagues ▼
China PR - Super League: Equalizers
Equalizers scored
Equalizers scored (Total)
| Total | GP | Goals giving lead to opponent | Equalizer goals scored | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Total | per game | Total | per goal giving lead to opponent | ||||
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 12 | 0.41 |
|
7 | 0.58 | 58.3% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 17 | 0.59 |
|
10 | 0.59 | 58.8% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 18 | 0.62 |
|
9 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 17 | 0.59 |
|
7 | 0.41 | 41.2% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 14 | 0.48 |
|
3 | 0.21 | 21.4% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 22 | 0.76 |
|
6 | 0.27 | 27.3% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 25 | 0.86 |
|
5 | 0.20 | 20.0% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 11 | 0.38 |
|
5 | 0.45 | 45.5% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 16 | 0.55 |
|
7 | 0.44 | 43.8% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 19 | 0.66 |
|
11 | 0.58 | 57.9% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 22 | 0.76 |
|
12 | 0.55 | 54.5% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 21 | 0.72 |
|
6 | 0.29 | 28.6% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 16 | 0.55 |
|
6 | 0.38 | 37.5% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 23 | 0.79 |
|
11 | 0.48 | 47.8% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 27 | 0.93 |
|
16 | 0.59 | 59.3% |
|
| Zhejiang | 29 | 23 | 0.79 |
|
11 | 0.48 | 47.8% |
|
| League total | 303 | 132 | 0.44 | 43.6% | ||||
| League-level equalizing rate: 43.6% | ||||||||
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 6 | 0.43 |
|
3 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 8 | 0.53 |
|
4 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
6 | 0.60 | 60.0% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
|
5 | 0.63 | 62.5% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 6 | 0.40 |
|
0 | 0.00 | 0.0% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 9 | 0.60 |
|
2 | 0.22 | 22.2% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
|
1 | 0.13 | 12.5% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 4 | 0.27 |
|
3 | 0.75 | 75.0% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 6 | 0.43 |
|
4 | 0.67 | 66.7% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 7 | 0.50 |
|
4 | 0.57 | 57.1% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 9 | 0.64 |
|
4 | 0.44 | 44.4% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 8 | 0.53 |
|
3 | 0.38 | 37.5% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
4 | 0.40 | 40.0% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 11 | 0.73 |
|
5 | 0.45 | 45.5% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 10 | 0.71 |
|
7 | 0.70 | 70.0% |
|
| Zhejiang | 14 | 7 | 0.50 |
|
3 | 0.43 | 42.9% |
|
| League total | 127 | 58 | 0.46 | 45.7% | ||||
| League-level equalizing rate: 45.7% | ||||||||
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 6 | 0.40 |
|
4 | 0.67 | 66.7% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 9 | 0.64 |
|
6 | 0.67 | 66.7% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
|
3 | 0.38 | 37.5% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 9 | 0.60 |
|
2 | 0.22 | 22.2% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
|
3 | 0.38 | 37.5% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 13 | 0.93 |
|
4 | 0.31 | 30.8% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 17 | 1.13 |
|
4 | 0.24 | 23.5% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 7 | 0.50 |
|
2 | 0.29 | 28.6% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
3 | 0.30 | 30.0% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 12 | 0.80 |
|
7 | 0.58 | 58.3% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 13 | 0.87 |
|
8 | 0.62 | 61.5% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 13 | 0.93 |
|
3 | 0.23 | 23.1% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 6 | 0.43 |
|
2 | 0.33 | 33.3% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
6 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 17 | 1.13 |
|
9 | 0.53 | 52.9% |
|
| Zhejiang | 15 | 16 | 1.07 |
|
8 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| League total | 176 | 74 | 0.42 | 42.0% | ||||
| League-level equalizing rate: 42.0% | ||||||||
Equalizers conceded
Equalizers conceded (Total)
| Total | GP | Lead-taking goals scored | Equalizer goals conceded | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Total | per game | Total | per lead-taking goal | ||||
| Beijing Guoan | 29 | 27 | 0.93 |
|
13 | 0.48 | 48.1% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29 | 21 | 0.72 |
|
6 | 0.29 | 28.6% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 29 | 14 | 0.48 |
|
6 | 0.43 | 42.9% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 29 | 21 | 0.72 |
|
6 | 0.29 | 28.6% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 29 | 21 | 0.72 |
|
13 | 0.62 | 61.9% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29 | 14 | 0.48 |
|
6 | 0.43 | 42.9% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 29 | 12 | 0.41 |
|
6 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 29 | 19 | 0.66 |
|
11 | 0.58 | 57.9% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 29 | 23 | 0.79 |
|
8 | 0.35 | 34.8% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 29 | 21 | 0.72 |
|
8 | 0.38 | 38.1% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29 | 22 | 0.76 |
|
8 | 0.36 | 36.4% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 29 | 16 | 0.55 |
|
7 | 0.44 | 43.8% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 29 | 20 | 0.69 |
|
9 | 0.45 | 45.0% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29 | 16 | 0.55 |
|
11 | 0.69 | 68.8% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 29 | 17 | 0.59 |
|
6 | 0.35 | 35.3% |
|
| Zhejiang | 29 | 19 | 0.66 |
|
8 | 0.42 | 42.1% |
|
| League total | 303 | 132 | 0.44 | 43.6% | ||||
| Lead-defending rate at the league level: 100% - 43.6% = 56.4% | ||||||||
| Beijing Guoan | 14 | 14 | 1.00 |
|
7 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15 | 11 | 0.73 |
|
3 | 0.27 | 27.3% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 15 | 9 | 0.60 |
|
4 | 0.44 | 44.4% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
2 | 0.17 | 16.7% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
6 | 0.60 | 60.0% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 15 | 12 | 0.80 |
|
6 | 0.50 | 50.0% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 14 | 9 | 0.64 |
|
4 | 0.44 | 44.4% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 15 | 11 | 0.73 |
|
6 | 0.55 | 54.5% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
4 | 0.33 | 33.3% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 14 | 9 | 0.64 |
|
3 | 0.33 | 33.3% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
5 | 0.42 | 41.7% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
3 | 0.30 | 30.0% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15 | 11 | 0.73 |
|
6 | 0.55 | 54.5% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
6 | 0.60 | 60.0% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
4 | 0.33 | 33.3% |
|
| Zhejiang | 14 | 12 | 0.86 |
|
5 | 0.42 | 41.7% |
|
| League total | 176 | 74 | 0.42 | 42.0% | ||||
| Lead-defending rate at the league level: 100% - 42.0% = 58.0% | ||||||||
| Beijing Guoan | 15 | 13 | 0.87 |
|
6 | 0.46 | 46.2% |
|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 14 | 10 | 0.71 |
|
3 | 0.30 | 30.0% |
|
| Chongqing Tongliangl | 14 | 5 | 0.36 |
|
2 | 0.40 | 40.0% |
|
| Dalian Yingbo | 15 | 9 | 0.60 |
|
4 | 0.44 | 44.4% |
|
| Henan Songshan Longm | 14 | 11 | 0.79 |
|
7 | 0.64 | 63.6% |
|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 14 | 2 | 0.14 |
|
0 | 0.00 | 0.0% |
|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 15 | 3 | 0.20 |
|
2 | 0.67 | 66.7% |
|
| Qingdao West Coast | 14 | 8 | 0.57 |
|
5 | 0.63 | 62.5% |
|
| Shandong Taishan | 15 | 11 | 0.73 |
|
4 | 0.36 | 36.4% |
|
| Shanghai Port | 15 | 12 | 0.80 |
|
5 | 0.42 | 41.7% |
|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 10 | 0.67 |
|
3 | 0.30 | 30.0% |
|
| Shenzhen Peng City | 14 | 6 | 0.43 |
|
4 | 0.67 | 66.7% |
|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 14 | 9 | 0.64 |
|
3 | 0.33 | 33.3% |
|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 14 | 6 | 0.43 |
|
5 | 0.83 | 83.3% |
|
| Yunnan Yukun | 15 | 5 | 0.33 |
|
2 | 0.40 | 40.0% |
|
| Zhejiang | 15 | 7 | 0.47 |
|
3 | 0.43 | 42.9% |
|
| League total | 127 | 58 | 0.46 | 45.7% | ||||
| Lead-defending rate at the league level: 100% - 45.7% = 54.3% | ||||||||
Season summary
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:
56.5%
No goal scored:
4.3%
Away team scored first:
39.2%
Avg minute home team scored first: 29.2 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 33.3 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.07
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.70
Lead-defending rate at home:
58.0%
Lead-defending rate away:
54.3%
Equalizing rate at home:
45.7%
Equalizing rate away:
42.0%
Home team lead duration:
32.9%
Teams level in goals:
46.5%
Away team lead duration:
20.6%